Six scales were developed, with two balanced scales and four unbalanced scales designed to tap low and high cohesion disengaged and enmeshed. Crosscultural adaptation and validation of the greek version of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales iv package faces iv package. The most current version, faces iv itself, is comprised of six family scales two balanced and four unbalancedof 7 items each, making 42 items. Fill in the corresponding number in the space provided answer sheet. The facesii will assess family relationships and family organization, the fras will assess family resilience, and the dscc will assess quality of life. This 6item scale measures family interaction and cohesion. The faces iv package includes the family communication. Family cohesion and adaptability evaluation scale of d. In over 250 studies using the family adaptability and cohesion scales. Pdf the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation. These were slightly modified faces r on the basis of pilot data and were administered to 42 clinic families families seeking or receiving psychological services and 206 nonclinic families.
The concept of cohesion has also been applied to family units. Again including all four family stages, the scores for. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale ii faces ii. An evaluation of the family adaptability and cohesion. Associations between family cohesion, adaptability, and.
Faces iv family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv 12. Family, couple, adaptability, cohesion, communication, circumplex model, gender, 1.
The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces ii. This provides for the stability within the family system. Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the family. Although the faces has become a widely used instrument for assessing childrens family relations, the possible linearity vs. However, there are no generally accepted, robust definitions for placeet althe family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale original papers. Correcting it entails the sum of odd items for cohesion dimension, and the sum of even items for. Differences in family cohesion, adaptability, and environment.
Those authors organized these two aspects into a circumplex model to illustrate different types of families. Family functioning was measured by the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales ii place, 2005. The findings suggest that there is no statistically significant difference between parents of both research groups on the cohesion, adaptability dimensions of family fimc. Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii. A problematic approach to the mea surement of cohesion has been to use group process. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale 331 int j clin health psychol, vol. The reliability values of the scores of each scale in this study are presented in figure 2. The original family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Psychometric properties of the spanish version of the.
Assessment of family functionality among the elderly with chronic illness. The interdyadic agreement between adolescents and parents was low. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a. Family adaptability and cohesion scale the national. This sixitem scale measures several aspects of the closeness of a family unit such as time spent together and emotional connection. This 30item, selfreport instrument was constructed to examine the frequency of. Pdf portuguese validation of the family adaptability and. As previously mentioned, the fss was modified for use in followup interviews for this longitudinal study. Family cohesion and adaptability in relation to family life.
Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces. Family adaptability and cohesion scale the national child. University of wisconsingreen bay, 1982 an abstract of a masters thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science department of family and. Reliability and validity of the family satisfaction scale. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in.
Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv. Family genogram, family circle, family apgar adaptation, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve and family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces are the most common tools to assess family function. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales core. The circumplex model of marital and family systems and the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales faces, have been used in over 1,200 research studies and have also been widely used in clinical settings over the past 25 years kouneski, 2002. To determine the dynamics of the family in terms of family cohesion and family flexibility in order to plot the family on the circumplex model. Pdf family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. We took this approach to avoid the problems encountered by the family adaptability and cohesion scale faces. Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in.
The circumplex model focuses on the three central dimensions of marital and family systems. Family cohesion assesses the degree to which family members are separated from or connected to their family. The family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and cohesion dimensions in family interactions. Faces instmment, a 111item, selfreport index, was developed in 1978 in the dissertation. Pdf relationship between family adaptability, cohesion. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a norwegian sample ingrid dundas cand. In the original reliability and validity analyses, the testretest reliability was 0. Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii in romania. Two basic assumptions of the circumplex model of family systems were evaluated. The family cohesion subscale is part of the relationship component of the instrument. As mentioned before, data supported a sixfactor structure of the instrument, three scales for cohesion enmeshed, balanced cohesion, disengaged and three for flexibility chaotic, balanced flexibility, rigid. Over 1,000 studies have been done using faces and it has become one of the most popular selfreport scales for assessing family functioning. This is the latest version of the faces olson, 2011. The family adaptability and cohesion scale iii in a norwegian.
Full text of family adaptability and cohesion evaluation. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales faces ii this instrument measures parts of the circumplex model of family functioning. Very low cohesion suggest that family members view themselves as disengaged. This latest revision was deemed necessary because previous versions of the instrument have produced scores that are often linearly related to. Factor structure and reliability of the revised family adaptability and cohesion scales. Family cohesion and adaptability in relation to family. Communication, family adaptability and cohesion were examined separately for adolescents and for parents, and significant relationships were found. Assistant professor, university of bergen, department of psychosocial science, division of developmental psychology, oisteinsgt. Family cohesion involves the interplay between an individuals autonomy and emotional bonding on the part of family members. Perceptions of communication, family adaptability and.
As that model has been criticised so the value of this dimensional evaluation has also been doubted. Department of social work bowling green state university richard d. Building on the expanding cross cultural interest in faces, the spanish version of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iv, aimed at the assessment of the dimensions of cohesion and flexibility of the circumplex model, was validated following the author. Using the 5 point likert scale provide below, please indicate the degree to which you agree or. The major hypothesis of the circumplex model is that balanced couple and family systems tend to be more functional compared to unbalanced systems. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv statistics. Olson and colleagues delineated two aspects of family behaviors. This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability, cohesion, and adolescent problem. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. Pdf the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale. This might be a good instrument for programs that attempt to improve parentchild relations. Pdf the objectives of the study are a diagnosis of romanian family using family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale iii, and interviews find.
The family cohesion scale is a nine item scale intended to measure the degree of commitment, help, and support family members provide for one another. All family members over the age of 12 can complete faces iv. Its validity and reliability in a midwestern sample by bruce p. Background the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iii using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function.
Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv 12202010. Oct 20, 2019 family coherence, family adaptability, and family type. Adolescent scores on communication, family adaptability and cohesion were significantly lower than parent scores. A psychometric study of the family adaptability and. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation. Psychometric properties of the facesiv in a pediatric. A family with and adaptability score between 15 and 39 is described as rigid, between 40 and 45 as structured, between 46 and 54 as flexible, and between 55 and 70 as very flexible. On the other hand negative feedback seeks to maintain status quo. Criminal justice program bowling green state university the circumplex model of family functioning, which includes measures of cohesion and adaptability, was used with a community. Our approach centered on a threeway comparison of published research. The present study examines the differences among latino families who are in the low, bicultural, and high acculturation stages on measures of family cohesion, adaptability, and environment.
The faces iv olson, 2011 is the latest version of the faces instrument assessing family functioning through two main. Family members should complete the instrument independently, not consulting or discussing their responses until they have been completed. May 24, 20 family genogram, family circle, family apgar adaptation, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve and family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces are the most common tools to assess family function. The hypotheses of the current study attempt to expand and. This study evaluated whether samples of adolescent repeat offenders, young adult prisoners, and adolescent nonoffenders were discriminated. In order to inform broader development and implementation of interventions to promote generational resilience in migrant and refugee families, we investigated available literature on the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces, a measure of family functioning. Family adaptability extent to which the family system is flexible and able to change. Factor structure and reliability of the revised family. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iv was developed to tap the full continuum of the cohesion and flexibility dimensions from the circumplex model of marital and family systems. The faces 11, a 30item selfreportquestionnaire, measured the two dimensions of family behavior, cohesion and adaptability. Family adaptability and cohesion scale iv facesiv the family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and cohesion dimensions in family interactions. This study showed scores of cohesion ranging from 37 to 79 across all four family life cycle stages.
At one extreme of the adaptability dimension a family is very chaotic, and. Preliminary results revealed a significant difference in age of migration among the low acculturation and the bicultural and high acculturation groups. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces was viewed as a useful tool for a period, but has been less popular of late. Introduction one modality of conceptualizing the family is using the cohesion, flexibility and communication constructs, proposed by olson as the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iii, the faces iii, or the. This paper looks at its use in families with two very different types of problem to assess its discriminatory ability. Maps are built on the circumplex model prepareenrich. Abstract family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv faces iv brazilian adaptation the aim of this study was the semantic adaptation of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale iv faces iv for brazil. Family cohesion, adaptability and communication the pennsylvania child welfare training program 203. Faces was designed to be curvilinear, that is, midrange scores would be healthy and very high or very low scores would be dysfunctional. In the present study, a reduced version of faces ii. University of wisconsingreen bay, 1982 an abstract of a masters thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science department of family. Jan 29, 2014 a family with and adaptability score between 15 and 39 is described as rigid, between 40 and 45 as structured, between 46 and 54 as flexible, and between 55 and 70 as very flexible. It is the emotional bonding that family members have toward one another.
Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. Pdf family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale. The two dimensions are family cohesion and family adaptability. Faces iii, developed in the family social science department at the university of minnesota, is designed to measure family cohesion degree to which family members are separated from or connected to their family. The family adaptability and cohesion scale facesiv was developed to evaluate the adaptability and. The majority of the elders g growth essentially refers to the realisation of emotional growth due to the freedom within the family to change roles. This study examined the relationship between adolescent adaptability, cohesion, and. Relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and.
The most current version, faces iv itself, is comprised of six family scalestwo balanced and four unbalancedof 7 items each, making 42 items. Pdf relationship between family adaptability, cohesion and. The family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale faces iii using the circumplex model has been widely used in investigating family function. Family coherence, family adaptability, and family type. Use of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales in child clinical research. Validity of the faces iv family assessment measure. Family cohesion, adaptability and composition in adolescents.
705 1066 230 656 285 1616 389 1602 567 1160 1303 1154 1265 1230 474 657 201 393 176 621 997 676 842 307 736 988 541 462 401 739 1090 1182 187 753 1070 1084 1125 399 614